'A news presenter said on air 'I don’t understand politics' blog discussion

A question about : 'A news presenter said on air 'I don’t understand politics' blog discussion

This is the discussion to link on the back of Martin's blog. Please read the blog first, as this discussion follows it.

Read Martin's Unbelievable! A news presenter just admitted on air 'I don’t understand a thing about politics!' Blog.

Please click 'post reply' to discuss below.

Best answers:

• Is it important for Newsreaders to know everything about everything or just politics?
  Why?
• A presenter who professed a lack of knowledge about finance would also be expressing a lack of knowledge about politics, since much of politics is about money and how it's to be used.
  A political commentator might want to know, say, that the real income tax rate on a real income of Ј20,000 fell to 75% of its 2005 value by 2010/11 and to 35% for 2015/16. Knowing that would be rather useful if a person being interviewed was asserting that a particular government hadn't done much for low earners. It might also be useful to know that real income tax on a real income of Ј120k had fallen to 97% of its 2005/6 level by 2010/11 but was subsequently increased and will be 103% for 2015/6. Say if a notional person being interviewed was asserting that a particular government was cutting taxes for the well off but not the working poor.
• I watch BBC news most mornings and I am amazed at the ignorance of the presenters in a wide range of topics. We cannot expect them to be experts on everything, but they should be intelligent and generally clued up on the issues they are presenting.
  Admitting that you don't know or understand a topic is fine, especially if you are then interviewing for more information as part of the segment, a wise person knows when to admit their lack of knowledge.
  BUT - the increasing tendency for presenters to ask outstandingly banal questions which betray not only their lack of basic knowledge, intellect and literacy/numeracy skills, but also their shocking inability to listen when they are an active part of the segment must be embarrassing for the BBC. Strangely, the presenters are not embarrassed - professional pride has taken a nose-dive!
  And the final insult is when a fairly straightforward topic has been discussed, but goes over their heads, we are asked to email or tweet the explanations in to them, occasionally a fair point, but have researchers ceased to exist? The values of inform and educate are slipping way behind in favour of entertain. Please could they whisper some answers into their ears then?
• I am wondering if the presenters KNOW the answers but are deliberately dumbing it down for the audience perhaps?
  Just like Saturday night TV, reduced to the lowest denominator.
• Not really newsworthy, lots of people struggle with it. Even Harry Redknapp left it all to his dog.
• I wonder if this goes with people happily saying "I'm useless at maths". For some reason it's embarrassing to admit "I'm hopeless at reading" but not at maths.
• Exactly what I was going to say, Porcupine.