23 Jun 2017

A question about : How can I sign a house over to my son?

How can an OAP sign a house over to her son, without it costing hundreds?

She lives in her own property and has paid the mortgage off. She has also paid the mortgage off on her OTHER property, which her son lives in.

So, she has 2 properties. One she lives in. One her son lives in. Both in her name.

His name is on the Deeds of the house he lives in, along with her and his dad (parents).

She wants to give the house to her son, now before anything happens to her.

What can be done?

Best answers:

  • I think you need to see a conveyancer (which is usually cheaper than seeing a solicitor). When my parents made their house over to me earlier this year, the cost was about £250 + £80 land registry fee, which I paid as I'm to be the one to benefit.
  • I know your original question was about how to transfer the title of a house to a son. Can I ask why the mother wants to transfer it?
    As a willwriter and former IFA I often come across requests of this nature. There are usually one of two reasons:
    1. Reduce the size of the parent's estate for IHT purposes; or
    2. Avoid the house being forcibly sold to fund long-term-care.
    In the case of 1 the inheritance tax 'gifts with reservation' rules apply, (unless the parent is paying a commencial rent on the property) which would negate the effect of the transfer for IHT purposes.
    In the case of 2 the 'Care in the Community Act' allows Social Services to question why the transfer was made; the only logical answer as to why a parent would give up her residence is to avoid long term care costs. It is illegal to dispose of assets to avoid these costs. Social Services would then consider enforcing the son to fund the parent's long term care - again negating the effect of the transfer.
    One final point. If the son does own the house what happens if he gets into financial difficulty and is declared bankrupt? What happens if the son (and assuming he is married) gets divorced? what happens if the son dies?
    What a costly mistake it could be to transfer ownership.
  • Completely and utterly agree with Willman Rodders.
    Its just not as simple and clear cut as people think this transfering property to sons and daughters......as he says lots of problems can arise.
  • I'm not so sure that all this applies - transfer of assets to avoid care costs etc. As I understand it, the OP owns 2 houses and only wants to transfer one of them to her son, which he's living in at the moment. (Is he paying rent to his mum for the house that she owns but that he inhabits?)
    I think if that was me, I'd want to give the son his own house as a gift. It's not like transferring the title to her own house to avoid care costs, which is the usual scenario we hear about (with monotonous regularity).
    The Mum in question is described as an OAP, which is a horrible demeaning term. She's a retired lady, one assumes - widowed or single, perhaps? There are better and more accurate terms than that horrible outdated 'OAP'.
    Margaret
  • A slight clarification. It is not 'illegal' to dispose of assets such as property in order to avoid possible future care costs. The council will simply refuse to make any contribution to the costs if they believe someone has deprived themselves of assets deliberately in order to avoid contributing to some or all of their care costs, although the time gap between selling and needing care is taken into account.
    In reality very few people need residential or nursing care and despite far more people living longer these days, government is keen for people to receive care in their own homes and the cost of this can be wholly or partly covered by attendance allowance.
  • [QUOTE/]
    One final point. If the son does own the house what happens if he gets into financial difficulty and is declared bankrupt? What happens if the son (and assuming he is married) gets divorced? what happens if the son dies?
    What a costly mistake it could be to transfer ownership.[/QUOTE]
    He would have to cover himself in case any of that happened including having a will himself to leave it to his own children if he has any would be the best thing I'd think
    I've been thinking about doing this for some time now somehow myself
  • I was told that there is a timespan of seven years, beyond which sons or daughters would be safe from having to pay care costs once they have acquired the property. Has anybody heard this?
  • Firstly thanks to 'errata' for correcting my earlier statement.
    With regards to Chateau and the 7-year rule - in my experience this is a common area of confusion. However ....
    The 7-year rule applies to inheritance tax planning (make a gift, and survive 7 years - the gift falls outside of the estate for IHT calculation.); and
    The funding of long term care costs is governed by Care in the Community 1990 and I understand there is no time limit.
    As a will writer some years ago I was concerned about the validity of using trusts in a will to protect property from funding long term care. The head of legal services for a council advised me that they will look at the background to each and every case. He stated there was no time limit; importantly if you are showing signs of dementia and then you make a will, or transfer assets away from your estate this is a 'clear sign of trying to avoid paying your fees'.
    Margartclare has mentioned in a couple of posts that long term care may not be a concern, and that the lady wants to give her second house to her son. I read, and have reread the original post and I missed Margaretclare's angle.
    However, I remain confused. The original post talks about two properties, both in mother's name and then states...
    His name is on the Deeds of the house he lives in, along with her and his dad (parents).
    so I am still not sure which property mother is looking to transfer to her son.
  • Local authorites may have flexibility on what kind of gap is acceptable between disposal of assets and requiring the LA to contribute to care costs.
    For instance 20 years may be ok, 20 months not. Of course the difficulty is that nobody can know whether they will need care eventually and when it will happen.
  • Our neighbour last year lost her Husband suddenly and as she suffers from dementia she was unable to look after herself so her only Son decided a nursing home was the best option for all. The property had to be sold to pay for the ongoing healthcare. He said to us it would not be what either of his parents would have wanted to have happened. No choice of passing on there lifetime wealth to children in this situation which I find a real shame actually. Dianne
  • My mum and dad bought their council house over 3 years ago and would like to transfer ownership over to me, they will continue to live in the house until they both pass on. However, what we are worried about is my mum and dad losing their benefits they are both on disability living allowance and they also get council tax benefit. If the house is signed over to me will that mean that I will have to then pay fulll council tax and that they will lose their DLA? They are both in their 70's and are just wanting to do right by me but I don't want them to lose out in any way and I just want them to enjoy the erst of their days in the home that they have loved for over 30 years. Can anyone advise me on this and any other in's and out's of this that I probably don't know about? Many thanks
  • Difficult to advise on this without you giving a little more as to why they want to do this. Is it IHT related (if your parents continue to live in the house without paying rent it will be considered a gift with reservation) or care home fees related (you need to consider deliberate deprivation of assets). What about if you go bankrupt or accidentally die what happens to the house then?
    As regards the DLA I think it would be better to start a new thread on the benefits forum
Please Login or Register to reply to this topic