01
Aug
2016
A question about : Sky pay Ј5.1BILLION for Premier Footie
This is insane. If this covers 4 years and Sky have around 11m UK subscribers then this means everyone is effectively paying well over Ј100 a year just to fund this. No wonder I currently have to pay nearly Ј60 a month for a Variety + Movies package with HD and Multiroom........
Best answers:
- if it keeps the football off real TV i am all for it
- Sky didn't but what's an incorrect headline in today's world.
- https://business.sky.com/roi/pubs-clubs/
- That pays for the footballers wages.
Hey, if they had a serious wage then everyone would be better off.
Perhaps we should ban football for three years and see what happens to people's pockets... - Sky paid an 86% increase to maintain their 126 game dominance, which means further cost cutting (over the last increase cost cutting) and further subscription increases.
BT paid a modest 30% increase, which means they can continue to offer BT Sport included in a BT Broadband subscription. This, along with all the Champions League, Europa League and joint BBC/BT Sport FA Cup coverage is a far stronger line up than what they have now.
Interesting times.
Category:
- 285 reads
Popular
- Getting post for someone never lived at address Views: 78,878
- Letter from po box 8743 bellshill Views: 50,431
- Transaction on my current account from "who internet internet" Who are they??? Views: 40,127
- What is EESA? Views: 37,303
- Lloyds TSB Trustcard loyalty points Views: 26,106